At first when I read about how the Geico Gecko had been included into popular YouTube vids I thought: "That's kinda interesting".
But then when I looked at the actual clips I realized they've just tried to capitalize on existing internet talent. Not a bad idea, but when the talent and clips are old (read outdated) how is that relevant?
Remember the Numa Numa Guy... barely (nearly 3 years old by now). Same with Noah who took a picture of himself every day for 6 years.
I applaud them for using the iconic Gecko in a subtle way and not trying to 'own' or change the entertainment value of the clips. But seriously, why not look at the up and coming videos and talent on YouTube and integrate with the 'next big thing'?
Probably because there's no sure why of knowing what's going to be the next big thing? Although there are ways that will help you track how quickly certain clips are gaining popularity - YouTube's "Rising Videos' is one way.
So the agency decided to rather go with clips/talent that had existing credibility. Not bad, but could've been better if the objective is to try to insert themselves into pop culture.
Kudos to the client for not trying to overtly brand or place sales messaging on the clips.
Here are some of the clips, in case you haven't seen them:
That's right. User Generated Content beat out top ad agencies for this year's best Superbowl ad.
The Doritos spot was created by two non-advertising guys (seen in the photo's on the wall in the background) as part of a Doritos Crash the Superbowl competition. It got a 8.46 score, the highest ad meter score on USA Today's 2009 Ad Meter.
My favorite, a spot for Pepsi which is based on a SNL skit (MacGruber) from the popular show MacGyver. So essentially a skit of a skit. Didn't rank very well though: 44th out of 50 ads.
Burger King created an app that encourages people to remove 10 of their Facebook friends for a free Whopper. I guess this is all in line with proving how badly people want a whopper.
In less than a week 233,906 friends were removed by 82,771 people. So, in numbers terms this appears to have been successful, right?
Once you removed a friend it actually notified them of the 'sacrifice', to help spread the viral nature of it. This kind of notification violates Facebook's privacy policy and to be honest probably hurt a few people's feelings.
I tend to agree with Facebook on this one. Facebook is about connecting people better and more efficiently. This idea goes against that.
It's an entertaining stunt, but not very valuable, unless you think giving up 10 facebook friends to get a free burger is worth it.
Nokia has created a website where you can design and buy your own Nokia 7310 Supernova.
At this stage it looks like you can only design the cover :(
Would be great if you could decide what features the phone should come installed with. Either way it's another great way of adding usefulness to people's lives by giving them the tools to customize.